Welcome Hello ! Welcome to your Legal Quiz 5 : Landmark Judgments Instructions: Full Marks: 40 There is no negative marking. There is no deduction for NOT attempted question. All questions carry equal marks and all 10 questions are of 4 marks each. Pass marks for this mock test are 04 All Questions are compulsory. (Powered By Kailasha Foundation - Fun & Learn Portal) 1. In which of the case for the first time, Supreme Court asserted that the Parliament cannot pass amendments inconsistent with the provisions of Fundamental Right? A K Gopalan v. State of Madras Keshawananda Bharti v. State of Kerala Minerva Mills v. Union of India Golak Nath v. State of Punjab2. In which case the Supreme Court declared that the Parliament has authority to change any provision of the Constitution including Fundamental Rights but its basic structure should not be abrogated Keshawananda Bharti v. State of Kerala A K Gopalan v. State of Madras Minerva Mills v. Union of India Golak Nath v. State of Punjab3. "Power of Judicial Review, a basic structure of Constitution, cannot be taken away by Parliament." In which case the Supreme Court Observed the statement? A K Gopalan v. State of Madras Keshawananda Bharti v. State of Kerala Golak Nath v. State of Punjab Minerva Mills v. Union of India4. Which case is also known as the First Amendment case? Berubari case Keshawananda Bharti v. State of Kerala Shankari Prasad v. Union of India A K Gopalan v. State of Madras5. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978)2 SCR 621, the Court held that- right to travel and go outside India is included in the personal liberty given under Article 21 Article 21 is controlled by Article 19, and it must be under the restrictions provided under Article 19 both None of the them6. In which case Supreme Court said that Article 21 is excluded from the basic freedoms giver under Article 21? A K Gopalan v. State of Madras Minerva Mills v. Union of India Golak Nath v. State of Punjab Keshawananda Bharti case7. Payment of Maintenance to a divorced Muslim wife under Section 125 of Cr.P.C was decided in- Sarala Mudgal v. Union of India Lily Thomas v. Union of India Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum Hussaina Khatoon v. Home Sectetary, State of Bihar8. "Right to life does not Include a right to die." In which case the Supreme Court held that? P. Rathinam v. Union of India Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration Visra Singh v. State of Punjab9. "Right to Life under Article 21 includes Right to Livelihood." In which case the Court held the same? S.P. Gupta v. Union of India M.C. Mehta v. Union of India Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India10. In which case the Court held that Preamble is not a part of Constitution? A K Gopalan v. State of Madras Berubari case Keshawananda Bharti case None of the aboveYou can always contact system administrator here for any kind of technical glitches. Business 1Utkarsh Gupta likes this.